header photo



Then do you think the most likely explanation

Traditionally, Moses is also the one credited with writing the first five books of the Old Testament. Symbolism is also paramount in Matthew's genealogy. Biblical genealogies are not a reliable means for determining the age of the Earth. And indeed it is. Since Genesis failed to record Cainan's generation, it is not a complete record. He was a technological primitive - a Bronze Age man.C. Is it possible that God did not emphasize that point because he didn't consider it essential that we know it? Do you think the biblical genealogies are necessarily complete and accurate? If so, why do the genealogies in Matthew and Luke differ over Jesus' genealogy? Was Jesus' father's father Jacob as recorded in Matthew 1:16? or Heli as recorded in Luke 3:23? Was the complete David to Jesus genealogy the 28 generations listed in Matthew 1:6 -16? or was the true David to Jesus the 42 generations listed in Luke 3:23-31? If one is the literal truth, what does that say about the other? Of all the names between David and Jesus, Matthew and Luke agree on only three names: Joseph, the husband of Jesus' mother, Zerubbabel, and his father Shealtiel. Ten is another symbolic number. The light we see from those stars was generated two million years ago. Unlike Moses, we who are living in the twenty-first century have at least a passing knowledge of astronomy, chemistry, physics, and microbiology. All things considered, that seems to be the most reasonable answer. And from Quasar 3C48 we are receiving light waves which were generated nearly five billion years ago. Creation of life, however, could have taken place in stages. Ironically, Genesis achieves the "symbolically complete" ten names from the flood to Abraham by dropping Cainan from the genealogy.

Questions to Consider: 1." (See 2:4, 5:1, 6:9, 10:1, 11:10, 11:27, 25:12, 25:19, 36:1 and 37:2." Matthew 1:8-9 I Chronicles reads the genealogy: "Jehoram his son, Ahaziah his son, Joash his son, Amaziah his son, Azariah his son, Jotham. Accuracy appears secondary to form. Life is complex, so is the universe, and so is reality." I Chronicles 3: 11-12 Here again, accuracy appears secondary to form. A good number of fundamental Christians make the six-day, relatively recent creation a pivotal point in their faith. Some say that Genesis is a historical narrative, and we should take everything it says at face value. We find 49 "sevens" in this work. Our nearest neighboring galaxy, the Andromeda galaxy is two million light-years away. God's design was deliberate. How symbolic is Genesis? One way of appraising it is to compare the frequency of symbolic numbers with non-symbolic numbers. It has become an article of faith for those who espouse evolution. Anyone taking a different position is "compromising the faith." Genesis reveals 19 "tens," but only 4 "elevens" and no "nines" at all. Did Jesus ask us to believe in him? or that the earth was a certain age and created in six days? 2. Are you still with me? Okay, here is the big question: If God had attempted to give Moses a FULL account of everything he did to create the universe and life, do you think Moses could have comprehended it? Do you think the top scientists of today would be able to understand it? No? Would there even be words in ancient Hebrew (or modern English) God could have used to convey the meaning of what he actually did? Probably not?

Then do you think the most likely explanation might be that God provided Moses with an abbreviated description of creation so he could understand it? Everybody agrees that neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament explicitly tells us when the world began. Scientists will be quick to tell you we have barely begun to scratch the surface of what there is to know. If we were to take the position today that the earth is flat, do you think we would gain or lose credibility? By the same token, if we claim the Biblical genealogies demand a 6,000 years old universe in spite of very strong astronomical evidence to the contrary, do you think the Bible gains or loses credibility? . But for those who believe in creation, age, and design are distinct issues. But to obtain the symbolically correct fourteen names between David and the exile, Matthew drops four "unimportant" generations which are listed in Chronicles, and the author adds another generation which Chronicles does not mention. When we gaze at the stars, we are, in fact, looking back in time. They were not intended for that purpose.) Moreover, Genesis records exactly ten generations from Adam to the flood, and another ten generations from the flood to Abraham. Certainly evolution relies on billions of years. After running into "seven" the forty-ninth time, you begin to suspect it is more than a mere coincidence. It's a fact. Genesis chapter one states that God created the world (and universe) in six days.

However, when we examine the book, we find that symbolism is prevalent throughout Genesis. The book Downlight GU10 MR16 Fixture is divided into ten main sections, each beginning with the word "account." The number "ten" plays a significant role in Genesis. It too stands for "completeness. However, considering the importance some place on this issue, I feel obligated to state the obvious. Light travels at a constant rate of speed - 186,000 miles per second or nearly 6 trillion miles in one year. Seven is a symbolic number which represents "completeness. This isn't speculation. Scientist call this distance a light-year. And why does Genesis skip Cainan who is mentioned in Luke 3:35-36 as Arphaxad's son? Genesis 11:12 reads: "Arphaxad became the father of Shelah when he was 35. We have good reason to believe the universe has been around for a long, long time. Galaxies from the Virgo cluster are points of light which have been traveling in space for fifty million years. For them it is not a debatable question. These balanced, symmetrical, symbolically correct numbers denote an artistic form. Moses was born in 1526 and died in 1406 B. Matthew reports fourteen (twice seven) generations from Abraham to David, another fourteen generations from David to the exile, and yet another fourteen generations from the exile to Jesus." Compare the number of "sevens" to the scarcities of "sixes" (8) and of "eights" (3) neither of which are used as symbols." It is not my intent to review all the pros and cons of the Young Earth versus the Old Earth controversy." Luke, however, shows Cainan as Arphaxad's son and lists Shelah as his grandson. Matthew's account: "Jehoram [was the] father of Uzziah, Uzziah [was the] father of Jotham. By comparison, Revelation mentions 11 "tens.Can we determine the age of the earth by counting the generations listed in Genesis? If the universe is actually older than 6,000 years, does that discredit the Bible? Does it discredit Christianity? Let's check it out. And if you bother to count up all the generations listed, the Bible seems to suggest the Earth is about 6,000 years old. Revelation, which is noted for its highly symbolic language and figures, uses "seven" on 53 occasions.

LED GU10 Spotlight